Interesting DNS Traffic
Mon, 31 May 1999 14:59:18 +0200
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 09:49:29PM -0500, Andrew Fessler wrote:
> I have seen some unusual things on my Cisco.
> I have some access-lists setup.
> I permit, SMTP, WWW, POP, IMAP, ECHO,ICMP and a few other ports as
> well as 1024-65535 for inbound.
> That theroetically should cover any inbound traffic.
> However, I see DNS requests and WWW requests come in where the souce
> port on the packet originates in the 800 range rather than the
> standard 1024-65535 range. Therefore the reply back is denied.
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (879) --> 220.127.116.11 (53)
> meaning a packet came in from the internet going to my DNS, however
> the source port of the packet was 879.
> I cant find any reason why they are having abnormal source ports,
> should I worry about this? Should I open the 800 range ports? Seems
> like opening my network more than I want to.
Could it be that the site asking for DNS info is using (heavily used)
Windows boxen? I have seen similar requests (originating from a low
order port) coming form Windows systems... Seems to be an implementation
"feature" from Micr$oft.
> Andrew Fessler
---end quoted text---
======= _ __,;;;/ TimeWaster ================================================
,;( )_, )~\| A Truly Wise Man Never Plays PGP: 64 07 5D 4C 3F 81 22 73
;; // `--; Leapfrog With A Unicorn... 52 9D 87 08 51 AA 35 F0
==='= ;\ = | ==== Youth is Not a Time in Life, It is a State of Mind! =======